|
Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd & Ors () HCA 25 is a landmark Australian judgment of the High Court.〔( Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited & Ors ) () HCA 25, at High Court of Australia Website〕 The matter related to duty of care by Crown Casino's for a patron with a gambling problem.〔( Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited ) (2013) HCA 25 at Austlii.〕 Harry Kakavas a known problem gambler with losses totalled $20.5 million claimed Melbourne's Crown Casino had engaged in unconscionable conduct by "luring" him into the casino with incentives and the use of the casino's private jet. The High Court found "He was able to make rational decisions in his own interests, including deciding from time to time to refrain from gambling altogether. Crown did not knowingly victimise the appellant by allowing him to gamble at its casino."〔 ==References== 〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|